Vantage Point:
Myths and realities of cloning
research
By DAVID MAGNUS, PhD
Last week’s news that a team of
researchers in South Korea successfully derived embryonic stem
cells from a cloned human embryo raises many pressing issues.
Making babies is not one of them, despite what some critics of
cloning research say.
Right after the announcement of the first success in deriving stem
cells from a cloned human embryo, debate began about how the
technology will inevitably lead to the cloning of children. There
is an enormous gap, however, between the creation of a cloned
embryo and a baby. Given the difficulties in producing cloned
primates, there is virtually no chance that a cloned embryo
produced today could ever become a child. The researchers are not
attempting to produce cloned children. Their interest is in
developing cures for diseases and disabilities.
This highlights the problem with the other objection to this
research. It is held by some that the cloned embryos that produce
the stem cells have the same moral status as children and that this
research amounts to murder. We should reject this view. These small
clumps of cells that are outside of the body do not have the
ability to ever become more than what they are. Weighing the value
of something that will never develop beyond a ball of cells versus
the patients we see at Stanford Hospital and Lucille Packard
Children’s Hospital is not a difficult choice. A promising
avenue of research that may one day help alleviate the suffering of
patients who now die awaiting organs or any of dozens of other
afflictions must be developed.
The most important ethical issues raised by the Korean announcement
are what it presages about where the technology is going to be
developed. U.S. policy virtually prohibits expending federal
funding on all forms of embryonic stem cell research using cloned
embryos or otherwise. This means that this promising area of basic
research is to be left in the United States to the private sector
and (increasingly) other countries.
Scientists here at Stanford and other universities are finding
their efforts to pursue this promising avenue of research stymied.
Without the resources of the NIH, or alternatively from a major
investment from the state, U.S. stem cell research will continue to
fall behind. If legislation written by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.,
(which was passed by the House of Representatives last year)
becomes law then even private-sector research would be banned. This
bill would even prohibit importation of cures derived from stem
cells – raising the specter that U.S. health care will fall
behind the rest of the world.
The research conducted by the team in South Korea also highlights a
problem with limiting federal funding. The researchers overseas
obtained informed consent and got approval for their procedures and
forms by an Institutional Review Board, or IRB. If this research
took place in the United States by a private biotech company, it
would fall outside the federal regulatory apparatus. Depending on
where the research was conducted, there would be no mandatory IRB
oversight or even informed consent from those who donated the DNA
or eggs that produced the embryos. Fortunately, in California, we
have state law that offers some protection, ensuring those who
donated the DNA or eggs that produced the embryos would know what
was going on if a private company did the same experiments
here.
It is important to remember that the fruits of stem cell research
will not be realized for a long time to come and it would be a
mistake to race to clinical trials before the basic research is
done that allows us to move forward in a safe and effective manner.
But that makes it all the more imperative that we allow government
funding of a research area that may one day answer the prayers of
our patients.
David Magnus is co-director of the Stanford Center for Biomedical
Ethics. A version of this piece, co-written with Arthur Caplan,
PhD, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of
Pennsylvania, appeared Friday in the San Jose Mercury
News.
|